Press Release
4.4.2019
Students Transform Dying Tree
On the 4th of April 2019, Dane John Gardens and ‘GROWTH’ exhibited experimental work by five 2nd year degree students currently in study at the University of Creative Arts at the Canterbury Campus. New project work was created responding to critical issues within the unconventional surroundings of the beautiful established landscaped grounds of Dane John Gardens.
Visitors walked beneath and between the structure of grandeur trees that contained a mixture of textured and pigmented interior mediums that reflect and refracted light and of which reflected a language of hope.
‘GROWTH’ invited park users to spontaneously observe students responding to spiritual memories, contemporary environmental issues, mental illness and the phenomenology of process and growth. This pop up exhibition grabbed the attention of a diverse audience and engaged the public in a social environment as the students that collaborated on the project were keen to discuss their creative practice. The Park Warden; Sadie Williams from Canterbury City council was pleased to see the park being used in a positive way.
The Group ‘Growth’ participants were Chloe Hill, Megan Maslen, Tyler Potter, Tasha Relton and Melinda Winter, whom can be followed on instagram @growth2019uca and welcomes future pop up event invites.
Photos credited to Lou Hardy and Chloe Hill.
Self Assessment Criteria of this public outcome project.
A1- Develop knowledge and methods , techniques and strategies for developing Art work and realising art within a context of contemporary art.
This project was a step forward from the last group collaboration in Cyprus. With our knowledge and experienced gain in Cyprus we were able to develop those skills with confidence. Tyler and Chloe were both students I had strong connections to after our time spent together in Cyprus but we also work with the same medium being Fibre. We quickly set up a communication feed on messenger and had our first meeting in the UCA bar. We all were able to discuss ideas for the project in a friendly yet assertive manner. Tasha felt welcomed but didn’t know us as well. She was very keen to put herself forward to set up communications link with the local council so her participation was spot on. One member of the group was not willing to come along to the weekly meetings we arranged and her lack of engagement with the group has had consequences. Our method was to be as open and honest as possible, explore all possibilities and challenge each other on unrealistic ideas. Our follow up and review communication was not successful as we never worked on one piece together which was one of the main themes. Our technique of always making contact with each other in person was very helpful. Every time we came to UCA we would always meet up and have impromptu catch ups , discuss work and go away with clarity. We considered asking for help from tutors and arranged several meetings with Joan Key, Sara Trillo and Peter Hofer. Our Strategy was to keep communicating and to sort out any concerns asap. From our previous experience, the lack of open communication equalled issues and this is problematic for a project. We were all so surprised how well the group worked together, other than one member who obviously prefers to work independently.
A2- Develop the ability to work independently and collaboratively
I feel that we would all be better students and practitioners if we were more adaptable. Some people can become more adaptable when offered incentives such as money but for this experiment, students are learning to understand their comfort zones. From my lived experience of working (which is longer and more diverse than other students), I know I can work well independently and as a group. I am not an easy person to work with as I ask questions and Im reluctant to start something new without knowing why we are doing it. I need clear reasons for the effort I will enthusiastically perform as Im very rational. What I need to develop is the understanding of who I can work with and who I can’t work with. Or how to adapt my practice so not to exclude others but to involve others. Understanding clear objectives; is the work one piece to be worked on together or individual work but working within a theme? Or just sharing space to reduce the gallery cost? Will the individual work mingle with other work but this may all be unsure until the curating takes place.
Working with other students is like working with a selective community. If I was to work with the random public where skill set is unknown and physical ability is unknown then my co workers could be anyone and my skill set would have to change to accommodate the engagement needed to label the project to be a collaboration. Some students show anxiety, drug related dependency or conditions such as Bi-Polar but only after triggered episodes. The tell tale signs is what people need to invest in and knowing who your working with will impact the outcome of your public outcome. Intuition takes time to gage and realising the situation you have walked into and dealing with that as a physical, verbal reaction or dealing with it introvertedly will however effect your production of work. Artist have always worked with people, people haven’t changed but we are more likely to understand them though a process of categorising them. When working with a team its can be more enjoyable and less work if curating and making all the work for a solo show. But working independently can be very rewarding, they both have pros and cons, both are challenging but CAP2 was an introduction to establishing a foundation in managing our adaptability.
A3-Critical analysis in writing and discussion.
After a discussion with Joan Key we were questioning our work in broader terms. Such as considering scale and time to make new work for the installation or showing of work together or spread out. As a group we needed to be more focused on the meaning and the virtual, so how the work may be read by an audience and discussing the outcomes and the implications this may have on the overall perception of our work as a collaboration. make sure we interact with the audience and note down these details, but how do we interact with the audience? This allowed us to consider sharing our art practice with the audience, sharing our ways of working and encouraging people to join in with making something at the event. She also drew our attention to how the work will live on after the event so documentation is vital but also photographing the work. This allows the work to reconfigure, to form work to be consumed in another situation and therefore communicates a different meaning or context. She mentioned Melanie Klein and her observations developing her child psychoanalysis. I like this idea of seeking out connections between children, gardens, trees and the generalising of the medium we are using in our show. Such as Yarn Bombing, Gendered Art and Craft.
A4- Present idea and curatorial proposal writing, project description and presentation of work.
We all filled in the UCA risk assessment form and wrote a proposal for this show in February and circulated of artist statements to one another. Our proposals were very vague and adapted to the site once we were certain on the size and scale of the situation. We created a handout to present to visitors to explain our work in more detail. We wrote a Press release and sent that on to three local news publications. We should have done and overall comment on the handout introducing the work and why we wanted to work together as that’s what the audience was questioning. We should have had a follow up and review using this self assessment as a guild.
Destination art has to be experienced within the area that is designated to. We test installed this work 3 times before the showing, the impact of the art and the context needed to be reviewed as the groups work was still in progress. We realised after the test installs that even more work was needed so to give the work more impact and balance out the dynamics of the natural surroundings. Art in public spaces isn’t new and has been used to encourage regeneration of social engagement for years. We wanted to experience our work within a local landscape garden so to interact with a variety of people, so people can observe us as artist valuing nature as highly as an exhibition space. Its an intervention to the symbolic order of nature. The showing of the work and engaging with the work is how the tactility of the medium encompasses.
A5- Situate work in a wider social culture, intellectual or institutional terms and in relation to audience.
We wanted to bring attention to our work in a public space that wasn’t confined to the social norms of the institutional confinements of the established Art Gallery. Joan key did point out to us that the Dame John Gardens may not be confined to the rules of the gallery but still follows institutional ruling; that of the town council. We needed to make a decision, were we going to continue seeking authorisation for the show through the regular networks of council officers or just be rebels and spontaneous and plan a day to install the art work and hope no-one tells us to remove ourselves and work from the park.
At this point I contacted the head of the yarn Bombing club in Whitstable and asked a few questions about how they install their work and what things they take into consideration. Anita Small was such as huge help and a brilliant person towards the group. She offered to drop into UCA and meet with all the group to answer any questions. The group showed her around the studio as a visitor and we sat down together and talked for an hour on possible sites to display work, weather implications, vandalism how the work will be received by people, possible workshops and dos and don’ts suggestions. She offered to help set up a club in one of the local coffee shops. She later dropped off two bags full of wool, hoops, crochet hooks and samples to help us get started because she remembered how crippling it was living off a student grant. Her experience and networking was a fundamental resource for this project.
After reading; Freud, Fabric, Fetish. by Anne Hanllym found in the Textile Reader (p.14) It states that …”Sigmund Freuds notorious writing likens weaving to a compensation strategy for women dealing with penis envy, or concealment of genital deficiency, which the act of weaving handily provides”. Anne then explains that she is not the first writer to consider the connection between the fetish of textiles from the point of view of gender but however this connection still seems unresolved. Fabric is the material that covers, hides, conceals ones nakedness but also hints at their presence or accentuates their figure, its an enigma. Fabric can be the visual ego, someones inner personality or inform others of their uniform. But the surface, the covering is superficial, its an imaginary signification as far as Lacan registers. Fabric and objects are materialistic so are subjected to perversion or are tools of/for fetichism, they are the tools of desire enforced by capitalism and popular culture. Our relationship with fabric is intrinsic with commodification. Evidence of this would be Film Theory and Laura Mulvey visual cultural critical response associates males as active and perverse and Women as Passive and hysteric, the difference can be narrated through fabric such as clothing or accessories / props.
What has this got to do with ‘Growth’? I think the covering the dying tree with our work was an act of comforting it, gifting the established ancient tree with our work, which were hand made creations. This gesture was evident when other students commented that it reminded them of Christmas trees, decorating pine trees is a global traditional ritual. This materialistic tradition is a form of fetish behaviour, the art work wasn’t going to save the tree but we desired to make the tree look brighter, happy and loved.
A6- Work within the capacity of a professional artist, making decisions, taking responsibility , accountability and managing self.
I think we were excellent at working to a professional ability. We proposed our ideas, review our risk assessments , we managed our regular meetings, we coordinated our communication to fit in around our other commitments and we asked for help and support from tutors and technicians. We networked with others outside the university and above all we represented the university in a responsible manner.
The Park Ranger did come to visit us on the day of the showing and we discussed our work with her and explained why we had set up an installation within the park instead of an art gallery. We wanted to use a space unconventional, we wanted to resonate with a wider audience and we wanted to relate our work within a natural landscape. Sadie Williams was very pleased to see the park being used for positive use and was disappointed by all the bad press the park had received as the stories being printed were from 2-3 years ago. She took some photos and one of out leaflets. She was maybe a contact we should have made earlier, but then that meeting may have had an alternative outcome. Explaining a proposal or visualising it can be interpreted differently and her response to seeing the work insitu was positive.
References
Dame John Gardens research website. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1001360. accessed on the 2.3.2019. (A park within the walls of Canterbury that dates back to 1551. It was an Roman cemetery in the city that then turned into a motte and daily castle in the 11th century. Was financed to become a civic park from 1790 with its vast Lime tree avenue. The gardens are listed and registered a historic park and garden. Was used as an ammunition depot during the 2nd World War which is strange, as so close to Canterbury Cathedral!)
Risk Assessment
Textile Reader English edition First published in 2012 by Berg
London WC1B 3DP, UK 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA © Jessica Hemmings
Canterbury City council https://www.canterbury.gov.uk
https://nparadoxa.com is a great resource, Art and Feminism magazine and this is a link to a FREE MOOC. referred to by Joan Key.